Aktuelle Änderungen Printable View Änderungen Bearbeiten
LanguageFights > LarryWall > Leiningen > LessCode > LexerAndParser > Linux > LiquidInformation > LispEnlightenment > LispExtensions > LispHacks > LispInOtherLanguages > LispMachines > LispOnSpeed > LispOrScheme > LispSprache > Lisp > LispTreasuryClear TrailGettingLisps
- http://www.lisperati.com/
- comics and comical tutorials
Lisp ist eine Sprachfamilie. Deren bekannteste Vertreter sind CommonLisp und Scheme.
Von JohnMcCarthy 1958 als verbesserte Alternative der TuringMachine (entwickelt) entdeckt. Somit ist Lisp eine der ältesten Programmiersprachen. Im Unterschied zu anderen Sprachen (Fortran), die ähnlich alt sind, boomt Lisp zur Zeit wieder. Dies ist nicht unwesentlich PaulGraham zu verdanken, ein Lisp-Hacker, der durch den Verkauf einer von ihm entwickelten Webanwendung Millionen Dollar gemacht hat.
If someone set off a bomb in this room, it would wipe out half of the worldwide Lisp community. That might not be a bad thing for Lisp, because it would have to be reinvented. [1]
the greatest single programming language ever designed [2]
Lisp -> Lots of Irritating Superfluous Parentheses ;-)
Lisp is worth learning for the profound enlightenment experience you will have when you finally get it; that experience will make you a better programmer for the rest of your days, even if you never actually use Lisp itself a lot.EricRaymond
LISP has survived for 21 years because it is an approximate local optimum in the space of programming languages. [that was 1980][3]
- History of Lisp
- History of LISP-project @ Software Preservation Group
- huge source of seminal papers
- Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and Their Computation by Machine, JohnMcCarthy 1960, This was the original paper on LISP.
although John McCarthy?, inventor of Lisp, strenuously denies that Lisp was ever intended to be an implementation of the lambda calculus.[4]
- Lisp Notes
- Wiki:ImplementingLisp
- Wiki:ReadEvalPrintLoop --REPL, Lisp or any interactive language
- http://www.engin.umd.umich.edu/CIS/course.des/cis400/lisp/lisp.html --Lisp
- http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp?cmd=show&ixPost=94006 --Lisp and Productivity
- http://mypage.iu.edu/~colallen/lp/ --Lisp Primer
- http://yacas.sourceforge.net/LispProgrammingchapter1.html --einführung
- http://patricklogan.blogspot.com/2005/04/new-lisp.html --New Lisp (Ruby, Python, Smalltalk)
- http://www.lisp.org/ --Association of Lisp Users
- http://www.franz.com/ --Allegro CL, a dynamic object-oriented development environment for Common Lisp, ideal for creating complex, mission-critical applications very quickly.
- http://www.paulgraham.com/diff.html --What made Lisp different.
- http://lisp.tech.coop/ --*hyper-cliki* a lisp wiki
- http://wiki.alu.org/
- http://patricklogan.blogspot.com/2005/07/termite-lisp-for-distributed-computing.html --Termite: a Lisp for Distributed Computing
- Lisp Wins (I think)
Choose PaulGraham's essays and
s/LISP/Python/g.Python- The Lisp Top-Level == interpreter
SymbolicProgramming
- Understanding Symbol Manipulation, putting away with sum myths about Lisp...
- Symbolic programming using Common Lisp
The main difference between Lisp and most other languages out there is that Lisp has been designed for computing with symbolic data.
(+ a b) is a Lisp expression
'(+ a b) is Lisp data
This enables the easy manipulation and computation with symbolic expressions that stand for Lisp programs, algebra terms, theorems, logic expressions, rules, frames, music compositions, ... and many more.[5]
The more you learn about Lisp the more frustration with other languages.[6]
- Common Lisp - Myths and Legends
- Pascal Costanza's Highly Opinionated Guide to Lisp by PascalCostanza
- Why Lisp is different
XMLitis
Lisp is executable XML with a friendlier syntax.
- Lisp has not syntax. Lisp has no parentheses. Lisp as no lists.
- XML is not S-Expressions
- Executable XML (aka Lisp)
This is one great advantage of Lisp-like languages: They have very few ways of forming compound expressions, and almost no syntactic structure. . . .
After a short time we forget about syntactic details of the language (because there are none) and get on with the real issues.
—Abelson and Sussman [7]
- Lisp - The Ducati Of Programming Languages
- like riding a motorcycle: direct and fluid
- Haskell: Lack of fluidity is made up for by architectural guidance.
One day I mentioned what I've been doing to a friend over lunch. He never understood my affection for "weird" languages - few people ever do. "So what's it like to program in Lisp, anyway?" he asked. Suddenly the three year old analogy was snatched from the dark depths of my memory. "It's like riding a bike", I said.
A Common Lisp compiler is not just a tool - once you acquire a critical mass of knowledge it becomes an extension of mind and body. You think of where you want to be and a few keystrokes later you're there. Your mind doesn't have enough time to notice the delay. Hacking Lisp programs is such a fluid process that it's hard to think of the machine as an external entity. Common Lisp is the Ducati of programming languages.
- Lisp 1
- one namespace for both functions and variable - a symbol can hold only one value
- Lisp 2
- one namespace for functions, and one for variables - a symbol can hold two values
> I think attitudes like that probably explain why Lisp
> never caught on.
Just because something is right doesn't make it popular.
Just because something is popular doesn't make it right.
And that is pretty much the state of computer languages. [8]
- The Bipolar Lisp Programmer and other essays, via [9]
- Why Won't Lisp Just Go Away?
- Lisp is sin
- http://www.secretgeek.net/lisp_truth.asp
- Why Lisp Is Unpopular
- http://www.winestockwebdesign.com/Essays/Lisp_Curse.html
- Raw Thought: Rewriting Reddit
- The Python version had less code than ran faster and was far easier to read and maintain.
- Reddit and Lisp psychosis
- networking and threading are problem-areas of Lisp
These languages will never be mainstream, because the mainstream would never see the benefits they provide. The mainstream would kill themselves with such power. There's a reason the mainstream likes manifest typing, procedural programming, and cut and paste methodologies, quite simply, it's all they can handle.[10]
- Aha! moments on comp.lang.lisp
- http://abhishek.geek.nz/docs/features-of-common-lisp
- http://www.reddit.com/r/lisp/comments/9ijq1/before_you_start_learning_lisp/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/lisp/comments/banuj/i_must_confess_that_i_was_very_slow_in/
- http://www.reddit.com/r/lisp/comments/bnovp/lisp_philosophy_1987_pdf/
PeterNorvig: