DenkzeitWiki

XMLitis

• XMLBasedProgrammingLanguages
  
  
• http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/the_evolution_of_language
• http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/s-exp_vs_XML
  
  
• http://blog.gungfu.de/archives/2004/07/01/xml-ist-bse/
  • XML Fever
    
  
  
• S-expressions for XML documents
• XML is not S-Expressions
  • http://www.prescod.net/xml/sexprs.html
    
  
  
• Phosphorous, The Popular Lisp
  • http://jfm3.org/phosphorous.pdf
  • http://www.reddit.com/r/lisp/comments/8zqvs/phosphorous_the_popular_lisp/
  • a faked Lisp with XML-syntax
    
  
  
• XML Fever and its cures...
  • http://docordie.blogspot.com/2006/08/xml-isnt-self-describing.html
    

• http://dataspora.com/blog/xml-and-big-data/
• http://dataspora.com/blog/the-rise-of-the-data-web/

XML was designed for documents, not for data.

• http://coliveira.net/software/xml-as-a-declarative-programming-language/
  • I couldn't agree less with:

The advantage of using XML, though, is that one doesn’t need to use yet-another-parser for a domain-specific language. At the end, using a generic format such as XML is almost as good as the s-expressions used by Lisp.